Jump to season: 2010-2011 | 2011-2012 | 2012-2013
Player |
FGA |
TS% |
%Shots at Rim |
FG% at Rim |
%Assisted at Rim |
%Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
%Assisted 2pt Jumpers |
%Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
%assisted 3pt |
FTA/FGA |
FT% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Landon Clement |
64 |
0.499 |
12% |
50% |
25% |
20% |
31% |
25% |
67% |
35% |
80% |
0.23 |
67% |
C.J. Wilkerson |
54 |
0.630 |
39% |
71% |
27% |
31% |
35% |
50% |
30% |
50% |
75% |
0.46 |
68% |
Nick Chasten |
38 |
0.451 |
26% |
60% |
17% |
45% |
41% |
71% |
29% |
27% |
33% |
0.11 |
25% |
Justin Leemow |
22 |
0.382 |
59% |
46% |
0% |
23% |
40% |
0% |
18% |
0% |
--- |
0.27 |
50% |
David Best |
21 |
0.547 |
67% |
71% |
40% |
33% |
29% |
50% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.10 |
0% |
Marvin Fitzgerald |
13 |
0.553 |
54% |
71% |
20% |
15% |
0% |
--- |
31% |
25% |
100% |
0.38 |
80% |
Emanuel Chapman |
11 |
0.524 |
36% |
75% |
0% |
36% |
25% |
0% |
27% |
33% |
0% |
0.82 |
56% |
Dijon Manns |
10 |
0.504 |
100% |
40% |
75% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.40 |
100% |
Jeremy Ingram |
8 |
0.553 |
50% |
75% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
50% |
0% |
--- |
0.75 |
100% |
Tramar Beaman |
7 |
0.357 |
57% |
25% |
100% |
0% |
--- |
--- |
43% |
33% |
100% |
0.00 |
--- |
Johnathan Nicely |
5 |
0.200 |
40% |
50% |
100% |
60% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0.00 |
--- |
Dwayne Sims |
3 |
0.500 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
33% |
0% |
--- |
67% |
50% |
0% |
0.00 |
--- |
Michael Glasker |
1 |
0.513 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
100% |
0% |
--- |
2.00 |
100% |
Marcus Graham |
1 |
0.256 |
0% |
--- |
--- |
100% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
--- |
2.00 |
50% |
TEAM |
258 |
0.512 |
38% |
60% |
33% |
27% |
31% |
45% |
35% |
33% |
70% |
0.31 |
66% |
Shot Type |
% of shots |
FG% |
% of Shots Blocked |
Unblocked FG% |
---|---|---|---|---|
At Rim |
41% |
61% |
11% |
69% |
2pt Jumpers |
23% |
38% |
5% |
40% |
3pt Shots |
36% |
39% |
0% |
39% |
This table describes the first shot taken after gaining possession. Only possessions that start with a rebound, made basket by the opponent, steal, or dead ball turnover are considered. Shots that occur after the defense has fouled are not included.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
16% |
48% |
53% |
53% |
22% |
29% |
25% |
38% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
17% |
53% |
32% |
64% |
21% |
29% |
47% |
38% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
6% |
27% |
27% |
67% |
45% |
20% |
27% |
0% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
37% |
47% |
30% |
64% |
36% |
37% |
34% |
28% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
12% |
65% |
67% |
69% |
12% |
0% |
21% |
60% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
1% |
0% |
0% |
--- |
0% |
--- |
100% |
0% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
4% |
62% |
12% |
100% |
25% |
50% |
62% |
40% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
8% |
33% |
47% |
29% |
20% |
0% |
33% |
40% |
This table is similar to the one above, but describes the results for opponents during games against NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL.
Start of poss |
% of initial shots |
eFG% |
% Shots at rim |
FG% at rim |
% Shots 2pt Jumpers |
FG% 2pt Jumpers |
% Shots 3pt |
FG% 3pt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebound, 0-10 s |
15% |
47% |
39% |
42% |
13% |
50% |
48% |
33% |
Rebound, 11-35 s |
22% |
47% |
32% |
36% |
27% |
42% |
41% |
39% |
Opp score, 0-10 s |
7% |
100% |
21% |
100% |
21% |
67% |
57% |
75% |
Opp score, 11-35 s |
34% |
53% |
36% |
64% |
27% |
47% |
37% |
31% |
Steal, 0-10 s |
7% |
82% |
93% |
77% |
0% |
--- |
7% |
100% |
Steal, 11-35 s |
2% |
88% |
25% |
100% |
50% |
50% |
25% |
100% |
Dead ball Turnover, 0-10 s |
2% |
30% |
20% |
0% |
20% |
0% |
60% |
33% |
Dead ball Turnover, 11-35 s |
11% |
32% |
41% |
67% |
27% |
17% |
32% |
0% |
Updated 2012-10-26